Survey results for “Author perspectives on manuscript submission”
| IV. Author perspectives on manuscript submission | |
|---|---|
| Questions | Results |
| 5. Manuscript submission experience to JKACAP | Yes (53.5%) No (46.5%) |
| 6. Awareness of translation fee support for primary authors who are resident in psychiatry | No (72.3%) Yes (27.7%) |
| 7. Future submission plans to JKACAP | Yes (50.3%) No (49.7%) |
| 7-1. Reasons for planning to submit |
Contributing to the journal’s development (63.7%) Communication with editors in Korean (45.0%) Listed in Scopus as an international journal (42.5%) Fast review process (38.8%) Trustworthy peer reviews (36.3%) Manuscript submission in Korean and translation support (35.0%) Reasonable submission costs (33.8%) |
| 7-2. Reasons for not planning to submit |
Lack of research opportunities (68.8%) Not listed in SCIE (21.3%) Inability to publish in Korean (21.3%) High submission costs (5.0%) Slow review process (0.0%) |
| 8. Required support to increase submissions |
Efforts to include in SCIE at KACAP level (52.9%) Submission in Korean for general members (34.2%) Submission in Korean and translation support for fellows (32.3%) Reduced submission fees for full members (27.1%) Korean communications during review (27.1%) Research fund prizes (21.9%) |
*multiple answers allowed. JKACAP,